www.WATTpoultry.com
l Jumphead l
JUNE 2009 volume 114 number 6
Deviating from low egg prices: Can the cycle be broken? 1
Preparing for hot weather 4
Editorial with Dr. Simon Shane 5
An interview with James M. Nield 6
Biofilm in watering systems 8
Nutrigenomics finds practical application 9
Establishing a focus on sustainability 11
Industry news 12
Product news 13
Deviating from low egg prices:
Can the cycle be broken?
From April to September, egg prices drop. As a result,
producers are looking for ways to maintain their pro ts.
molt during periods of high egg prices, they
will forgo pro ts.
Molting may prolong periods of oversupply.
For example, molted ocks typically peak at
levels about 10% greater than their production
at the time of molt. Since the period of oversupply may be longer than 10 weeks, when
molted hens return to production, total output
will be increased, resulting in an increased
supply of eggs when producers still need to
reduce supply.
The increased production can signi cantly
offset some of the bene ts of leaving houses
empty. This potential negative effect of molting
is often overlooked because of the anticipation
of increasing pro ts when egg prices increase.
As the persistency of lay increases in modern
strains (production up to 90% at 60 weeks), the
potential economic bene t of molting for individual ocks may need to be re-evaluated.
In the past, hens have typically peaked 10%
higher than pre-molt levels which helped offset
some of the eggs lost during molt. Therefore,
total production would only be about 5% less
than that for non-molted ocks. As production
persistency continues to improve, the increase
in peak production after molt will be nearer to
1%. The greater difference in total number of
eggs produced by molted hens compared to
non-molted hens could signi cantly reduce
the economic bene t of molting for individual
ocks and increase the bene t of molting in
supply management.
David A. Roland, PhD
Breaking the cycle of excess eggs from
Easter to Labor Day has proven extremely dif cult. Molting is the most
common approach to reduce egg supply. Because the window of molting is at least eight
weeks, producers can delay or accelerate the
initiation of molting and increase the normal
quantity of hens in molt soon after Easter. Although this can quickly get additional eggs off
the market, molting does not allow a reduction
in overall total supply of eggs due to differences in timing among producers with a variety of
molt programs.
If the window of opportunity for molting occurs during a period of low egg prices,
losses may be reduced at the same time as egg
supply declines. However, molting is much
like a two-edged sword. If producers have to
Balancing the scales
The goal of small-scale producers with a
high cost structure is to maintain demand at
a level higher than their production capacity.
Eggs are purchased to meet needs even in periods of reduced demand. During times when
prices are low these producers try to time molting to reduce potential supply to the market
while at the same time buying in eggs to help
ll orders. In many instances they can generate
an incremental pro t through marketing purchased eggs at the same time as they may be
losing on eggs they produce.
Small-scale producers may be more reluctant to leave houses empty than large producers
because leaving even one house empty in ad-